KELLEY LYNCH—PHIL SPECTOR FRIEND OR HANGER-ON?

Opinion—By Blogonaut

It turns out Kelley Lynch is a Johnny-come-lately Phil Spector “supporter”, who may be more motivated by money than friendship. Or is she?

Although the Leonard Cohen nemesis claims that she is a “dear friend” of the music producer, doubts remain.

Phil Spector’s close friends (and even some fans) attended at least one of Spector’s trial sessions as a show of support. Kelley Lynch never showed up once for any of the pretrial proceedings or any of the trial days for the two nine month trials—even though the Spectors were urging fans and friends to drop by and show their support on their website. Nor has Lynch been to visit her “dear friend” in prison since his conviction on murder charges earlier this year.

About two or three months before the end of the second Spector murder trial Kelley Lynch launched her first blog that she entitled “Phil Spector and Kelley Lynch”, a site that assumed that Spector would be acquitted and then Phil Spector would use HIS money and HIS assembled legal team to JOIN Lynch in suing her imagined enemies, including the LAPD, and in suing Cohen. (The site has since been removed by Google.)

Kelley Lynch has tried to make a case that her legal woes and Phil Spector’s legal problems were intertwined.

Lynch’s angle is that Leonard Cohen “may” have perjured himself in Phil Spector’s “secret grand jury proceeding” (presumably about Spector pointing a gun at him at a recording session years before), and the reason Lynch was “kidnapped” from her home by LAPD and taken against her will to “Killer King” (apparently a psychiatric facility) was to discredit Lynch as a “witness” against Leonard Cohen in Cohen’s “tax prosecution” so as to preserve Cohen’s viability as a prosecution witness against Spector.

Of course, Leonard Cohen never testified against Phil Spector, and Phil Spector’s legal team never raised any claim that there was perjured testimony before the grand jury that indicted the music producer in the trial court—thus waiving that as a legal issue (if it ever was one).

It is Kelley Lynch’s theory of linkage that gives her (false) hope that with Phil Spector is freed he will join “forces” (Spector’s money, his lawyers, Lynch the loyal supporter who was almost “murdered” by LAPD to “protect” Phil Spector) with her and finally, with a well funded and top notch legal team, sue the bastards that Lynch claims have “destroyed my life" life.

But, of course, it is fantasy constructed on the thinnest of foundations, because there never was any “linkage” between Kelley Lynch’s legal troubles and those of the music producer—except that Lynch and Spector knew each other (it is not clear how well) years ago, and (she claims) dined together (in addition to how many others she has not said) after Clarkson’s death.

That is why Lynch gets so furious when we insist that Phil Spector’s appeal from his murder conviction with not be premised in any way shape or form on “Kelley Lynch”, “Leonard Cohen” or what did or did not occur before the grand jury (which would not be cognizable on appeal in any event).

The appeal will exclusively address legal issues arising during Phil Spector’s retrial, and will primarily focus on the so called Evidence Code Section 1101 evidence—the handful of women who the prosecution called to testify that Spector menaced them with firearms—as well as the prosecutions related misconduct (arguing from that evidence that Spector not only had a “propensity to kill” but that the shooting by Spector was inevitable)—as well as related instructional error by the trial court.

Ultimately, Kelley Lynch is just another down and out former acquaintance of a celebrity who seeks to trade on that former association by persuading Spector to ride to her rescue with hundreds of thousands of dollars of his money and his lawyers.

In other words, Lynch (at least in our view) has her hand out plain and simple.

That core motivation, in our opinion, is why she always tries to inject Phil Spector’s trial into any discussion about Cohen.

BTW, some of you may notice that we have not posted on this subject in some time, but with over 100 emails in our inbox (several within the hour) from Kelley Lynch disparaging this blog and demanding our attorney’s “disbarment”, “arrest” and “prosecution” for daring to disagree with Kelley Lynch’s far out views—all cc’d to the IRS, Treasury agent Sopko, the Department of Justice, the Governor of Colorado and many others—we decided it is once again time to join the internet discussion about Ms. Lynch raging on other sites.

We welcome your views in the comments.

FAMED TEXAS TRIAL LAWYER JOHN O QUINN DEAD AFTER SUV CRASH


****Breaking*****

Texas trial lawyer John O Quinn has died as the result of the SUV he was driving at high speed in the rain leaving the road, the ABA Journal Reports.

Quinn’s employee, Johnny Cutliff, was also killed in the crash.

According to media reports, Quinn was driving more than 30 miles per hour over the published 40 MPH speed limit at the time of the single vehicle accident.

John O'Quinn is widely acknowledged as one of the most accomplished trial lawyers of his time, holding some of the largest verdicts and settlements in the country.

PAGEANT LAWYER USES SEX TAPE TO FORCE EX-MISS CALIFORNIA'S LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT-SOURCES REPORT

From the ABA Journal

Former Miss California Carrie Prejean is accepting a lot less than the $1 million she sought in her lawsuit against pageant organizers because lawyers for the beauty pageant obtained, and used, a “solo sex tape” featuring the beauty in settlement negotiations—the ABA Journal, citing CNN reports.

Read More




LAWYER WHO CHOKED DOG, BEAT WIFE IS STATE BAR PANEL MEMBER

Nevada State Bar hearing panelist, dog choker, wife beater, and common drunk Ed Miley, Esq.
We recently posted about the arrest of Vegas criminal defense lawyer Ed Miley for getting white-trash-drunk, choking the family dog, assaulting his wife, then discharging a firearm into the backyard (pretty much in that order)—our angle being the irony of the beaten spouse being Judge Stephanie Miley, the Vegas jurist who was voted in last year to replace disgraced (and later defrocked) Vegas Judge Elizabeth Halverson, whose husband also beat the 425-500 pound former jurist that everyone loves to hate. (See here and here.)

We now post to inform of the further irony in the case—that being the new info that thuggish wife beater, common drunk, and choker of gentle family pets Ed Miley, amazingly, for the last 12 years has served on a bar disciplinary panel that sits in judgment of Southern Nevada (i.e. Vegas) lawyers who allegedly transgress—er—get caught transgressing—Nevada bar ethics rules (such as they are in the "All For Our Country" state).

According to today’s article in the Las Vegas Sun news paper (that also describes the misdemeanor “citation” of a Vegas “attorney” who was disbarred in two Midwestern states, but never licensed in Nevada):

“[Mr. Miley] is well versed in how his profession deals with a lawyer who, like himself, winds up being charged with crimes.

“It turns out that for the past 12 years, Miley — who’s facing felony and misdemeanor charges stemming from an Oct. 1 altercation with his wife of 12 years, District Judge Stefany Miley — has been a member of the State Bar’s local disciplinary board.

“He’s among a pool of 49 lawyers in Southern Nevada who are called upon from time to time to hand out punishments to their colleagues who have run afoul of the standards of their profession.”

Why we are not surprised?

Read more.

IVY LEAGUERS TEAR PROFESSOR JONES TO PIECES OVER POORLY WRITTEN COMPLAINT AGAINST ABOVE THE LAW BLOG


11-4-2009 UPDATE, via Above the Law:
Breaking: Jones v. Minkin Dismissed!!!(Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses lawsuit against ATL.)

Apparently, Professor Jones tired of the 24 hours of verbal pummeling that he was receiving from all corners of the Blogosphere and saw the handwriting on the wall regarding where his suit was headed--i.e the world's most frivolous lawsuits bin. Anyhow, its over.


In case you missed the major blawg story of the day (and probably the year) University of Miami law professor D. Marvin Jones —who made the pages of this blog when he was arraigned on charges that he allegedly solicited a hooker—has the law Blogosphere’s panties in a twist over his lawsuit against the legal blog Above the Law and its founding editor David Lat.

Adding an additional layer of hilarity to the already embarrassing circumstances of professor Jones’ arraignment on criminal charges is the astounding fact that a law professor would file a federal court complaint riddled with spelling and grammatical errors (he misspells the President’s name in the fist paragraph and goes downhill from there), let alone that attempts to set forth a legal theory that the Supreme Court of his own home State of Florida refused to recognize just last year.

We are not big fans of the self described “most prestigious law school discussion board in the world”--AutoAdmit, but we could not make our way through even part of this thread without laughing so hard we nearly peed our pants.

Suffice it to say that the comments were, well, a tad harsh.

As once commenter posted:


“Before I read [professor Jones’ complaint], I expected to respond to your post by saying that pleadings are the one place where you can write like shit and get away with it. “But after reading that festering shit pile, I agree that UM should be deeply embarrassed.”
And another:

"This complaint is truly a disgrace, and I am not even talking about fucking typos. Apparently, he really believes that statements such as "Or Donald Marvin Jones." are sentences. This complaint is truly truly terrible. I hope he wrote it while completely intoxicated and then put it in a mailbox to the court for fling, forgetting that he had done so and leaving him no opportunity for sober reflection. It is the only excuse."

Our favorite:

"dear god. how the hell did this guy become a law professor"

Now go, read, laugh, cry. We did.

Congratulations kid, you broke your cherry….


Dear David Lat:

How can you call yourself a tabloidst™ if you have never been subjected to a ridiculous lawsuit by an apparently semi-literate pro se litigant who does not have a leg to stand on, and [in our opinion] cannot plead his way out of a proverbial paper bag?

Well, it is a badge of honor.

Wear it proudly, while you enjoy the support of the rest of us in the blogging community—all of us.

Blogonaut will have more, much more, to say about this hilarious Pearson-esque lawsuit later.

In the meantime, as we stated in our initial post, “it’s a hard life for a pro per.” Let alone a PUBLIC FIGURE, pro se litigant swimming upstream from the United States Supreme Court decision in Hustler Magazine v. Falwell. Let alone a constitutional law professor who can only come off as less than knowledgeable in his own [self-professed] field of expertise, should he, as we predict, lose this case.
Go David go!!!!!!