Opinion, by BlogonautWe have received many indications that the only source of daily Phillip Spector murder trial coverage, Sprocket’s Trials and Tribulations blog, is so hell-bent on seeing Phil Spector convicted of homicide charges [even a manslaughter conviction-WITH GUARANTEED LIFE SENTENCE + a mandatory CONSECUTIVE sentence addition for using a gun-would mean that Phil Spector dies in prison] that the blog even censors comments to blog posts that do not agree with the party line.
So we have agreed to provide a forum for those who disagree with the Taliban like, anti-American views expressed on T & L, including this censored T & L commentor:
“Dear Blogonaut:
“Re: Censored comments on Sprocket’s Trials and Tribulations blog
“I tried to post this response to “Ray” who posted today on T&L.
“First, Ray’s post:
“I would say that is more of a pathetic move by the defense team than a brilliant move. I seem to recall that the only Spector scheduled throat surgery once before and a few days of trial were canceled. Then he showed up without having had the surgery. Wasted time! I would bet that Weinberg told him not to do the surgery then, because it could come in handy some day if he needed to delay the trial. Weinberg is the correct lawyer for Spector....they are both unethical weasels.”
“Now, my censored response that I tried to post on T & L:
"Dear Ray:"You wrote:
"Weinberg is the correct lawyer for Spector....they are both unethical Weasels."
“Other than your assumption that Phillip Spector is guilty, please enumerate your evidence that BOTH Spector AND his lawyer Doron Weinberg are "unethical weasels."
“Please tell me there is more foundation for your character indictment of BOTH lawyer & client than the SPECULATION than "I would bet that Weinberg told him not to do the surgery then, because it could come in handy some day if he needed to delay the trial."
++++++++++++++++++++++
Other censored rebuttal comments:
“Spector is more dangerous than the night stalker and Manson…”
“Fairness! Sounds like "WhinyBerg's" posting comments now.”
"These two posts best exemplify just how ridiculous the extreme views prevalent on Sprocket’s Trials &Tribulations blog are.
"The first statement is so asinine that it does not deserve a response.
"The second, suggesting that “fairness” has no place in a criminal trial is equally ridiculous."________________________
5 comments:
Well, well, if you had not edited the remainder of the comments it wouldn't be so ass-i-nine. Agree?
It it clear you have no option but to stoop as low as the media azz folks. Spector's guilty and he's going down this time. You people know this and are livid!
The pic is nothing but trash.
Kinda like Phil Spector back on February 3, 2003.
We do not edit or censor comments on this site.
We do not understand to whom you refer as "you people."
We do not follow your conclusion that "we" "know" that the jury will convict in this case (we presume that is what you meant by "going down") or that a conviction is the only possible outcome in this case.
We do welcome your comment, however incoherent it may be.
All views will be published here.
The difference between America and Afghanistan is the rule of law--which applies equally to defendants we like and don't like.
Of course if Judge Fldler does not know this, why should we exxpet a dumbass like March 4, 2009 @ 1:15 PM to know what his country stands for.
How interesting that the hate Phil Spector comments all involve poor spelling, grammar and syntax?
I wonder what the typical employment status/educational level of these commenters is?
Perchance, a HS dropout, unemployed, over 27, lives with mom in basement, does nothing but skateboard, smoke dope, and post dumb-ass blog comments?
If not, then there is an epidemic of stupidity of unfathomable proportions.
"Well, well, if you had not edited the remainder of the comments it wouldn't be so ass-i-nine. Agree?"
Huh?
Post a Comment